#CrossborderChildhood

The special rights of migrant children are reflected in updated UN and Council of Europe documents*. The Chisinau Agreement* on the Return of Children, which is in effect in the CIS, is not in line with these norms of international law. Modern forms for regulating the return of children to their countries of origin must be created.

About the Problem

The migration laws of former Soviet countries do not treat children as independent rights holders. These countries do not have special agreements that specifically provide for the rights of children in migration. The main document that regulates the movement of children in the region is the outdated and heavy-handed Chisinau Agreement of Cooperation of States-Members of the Commonwealth of Independent States on the Return of Minors to their State of Residence (2002).

WHAT’S WRONG WITH THE CHISINAU AGREEMENT?

It is not in line with international legal norms

Under the Chisinau Agreement, children are returned to their countries of origin through “transit institutions” that are included in a special list. These are closed institutions, regardless of whether they are reception centers operated by the Ministry of Internal Affairs, transit shelters, or juvenile adaptation centers, which are classified as social or educational institutions.

However, the placement of children who have not committed any crimes and only have problems with their documents in closed institutions is viewed by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child and the UN Committee on the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families as deprivation of liberty and has been deemed unacceptable.

It is not in line with the changing realities of the region

The Chisinau Agreement was entered into by CIS countries in 2002. Much has changed in the region since then: Georgia left the CIS in 2008 and Ukraine left in 2018.

The list of transit institutions in the Chisinau Agreement has not corresponded to reality for quite some time: Armenia, Georgia, and Moldova have shut down reception centers; migrant children in Kazakhstan are placed in adaptation centers under the Ministry of Education; and police-run reception centers in Kyrgyzstan, Russia, and Ukraine now co-exist with social centers for migrant children.

These circumstances seriously complicate cooperation between states to return children.

What should the Chisinau Agreement be replaced with?

Special treaties between countries concerning the return of children should replace the Chisinau Agreement. These treaties must be based on the positions of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child and the UN Committee on the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families concerning the special rights of children in migration.

THE NEW TREATIES MUST INCLUDE:

  • a ban on the criminalization and immigration-related detention of children, i.e. their placement in Ministry of Internal Affairs institutions solely on the basis of their own or their parents’ migration status;
  • a ban on the separation of children from their parents solely due to the migration status of the children and/or their parents without sufficient grounds (if there is no threat to a child’s life or health);
  • transfer of the topic of “children in migration” from the police sphere to the social protection/educational sphere, provision of social services to children at all stages of their return to their countries of origin;
  • a guarantee of the right to education of migrant children in the process of being returned to their countries of origin;
  • the ability of children not to return to their countries of origin if this is not in their best interests;
  • monitoring by social services of the situation of children who have returned to their countries of origin, social support and rehabilitation for children and their families;
  • a guarantee of independent public monitoring of observance of the rights of migrant children during the process of their return to their countries of origin;
  • improved coordination and cooperation between various countries relating to children in transit, as well as between agencies within one country.

standpoints

Detaining migrant children for administrative purposes increases their suffering, and can have serious and irreversible consequences on their mental health and development. Detention is therefore never in the child's best interest.

Lilian Maury Pasquier President of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe for The Parliamentary Campaign to End Immigration Detention of Children

We need to repeat again and again and again; immigration detention is never in the best interest of the child. Unfortunately, detention is widely used.

Tomáš Boček Special Representative of the Secretary General on Migration and Refugees for The Parliamentary Campaign to End Immigration Detention of Children

It has been my position, however, that there are no circumstances in which the detention of a child for immigration purposes, whether unaccompanied or with family, could be in the child’s best interest. For this reason, the complete abolition of the detention of migrant children should be a priority for all states.

Nils Muižnieks Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe

international guidelines

CMW/C/GC/4−CRC/C/GC/23

Joint General Comment No. 4 (2017) of the Committee on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families and No. 23 (2017) of the Committee on the Rights of the Child on State obligations regarding the human rights of children in the context of international migration in countries of origin, transit, destination and return

Paragraph 5

Children should never be detained for reasons related to their or their parents’ migration status and States should expeditiously and completely cease or eradicate the immigration detention of children. Any kind of child immigration detention should be forbidden by law and such prohibition should be fully implemented in practice.

Paragraph 11

When the child’s best interests require keeping the family together, the imperative requirement not to deprive the child of liberty extends to the child’s parents and requires the authorities to choose non-custodial solutions for the entire family.

Paragraph 15

All children, including children accompanied by parents or other legal guardians, should be treated as individual rights holders and not as criminals; their child-specific needs considered equally and individually and their views appropriately heard and given due weight. They should have access to administrative and judicial remedies against decisions affecting their own situation or that of their parents, to guarantee that all decisions are taken in their best interests.

CMW/C/GC/3−CRC/C/GC/22

Joint General Comment No. 3 (2017) of the Committee on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families and No. 22 (2017) of the Committee on the Rights of the Child on the general principles regarding the human rights of children in the context of international migration

Paragraph 21

All children involved in or affected by international migration are entitled to the enjoyment of their rights, regardless of the children’s or their parents’, legal guardians’ or family members’ age, gender, gender identity or sexual orientation, ethnic or national origin, disability, religion, economic status, migration/documentation status, statelessness, race, color, marital or family status, health status or other social conditions, activities, expressed opinions, or beliefs. This principle is fully applicable to every child and his or her parents, regardless of the reason for moving, whether the child is accompanied or unaccompanied, on the move or otherwise settled, documented or undocumented or with any other status.

GLOBAL COMPACT FOR SAFE, ORDERLY AND REGULAR MIGRATION (2018)

Among the guideline principles: Child-sensitive: The Global Compact promotes existing international legal obligations in relation to the rights of the child, and upholds the principle of the best interests of the child at all times, as a primary consideration in all situations concerning children in the context of international migration, including unaccompanied and separated children

OBJECTIVE 7: Address and reduce vulnerabilities in migration

e) Account for migrant children in national child protection systems by establishing robust procedures for the protection of migrant children in relevant legislative, administrative and judicial proceedings and decisions, as well as in all migration policies and programmes that impact children, including consular protection policies and services, as well as cross-border cooperation frameworks, in order to ensure the best interests of the child are appropriately integrated, consistently interpreted and applied in coordination and cooperation with child protection authorities f) Protect unaccompanied and separated children at all stages of migration through the establishment of specialized procedures for their identification, referral, care and family reunification, and provide access to health care services, including mental health, education, legal assistance and the right to be heard in administrative and judicial proceedings, including by swiftly appointing a competent and impartial legal guardian, as essential means to address their particular vulnerabilities and discrimination, protect them from all forms of violence, and provide access to sustainable solutions that are in their best interests

OBJECTIVE 13: Use immigration detention only as a measure of last resort and work towards alternatives

h) Protect and respect the rights and best interests of the child at all times, regardless of their migration status, by ensuring availability and accessibility of a viable range of alternatives to detention in non-custodial contexts, favouring community-based care arrangements, that ensure access to education and healthcare, and respect their right to family life and family unity, and by working to end the practice of child detention in the context of international migration

OBJECTIVE 21: Cooperate in facilitating safe and dignified return and readmission, as well as sustainable reintegration

g) Ensure that return and readmission processes involving children are carried out only after a determination of the best interests of the child, take into account the right to family life, family unity, and that a parent, legal guardian or specialized official accompanies the child throughout the return process, ensuring that appropriate reception, care and reintegration arrangements for children are in place in the country of origin upon return